U.S.

U.S. funds our enemy Taliban's Afghan war

Afpak Mission channel http://www.youtube.com/user/AfpakMission AfPak military strategy blog …
Video Rating: 5 / 5

WASHINGTONA yearlong investigation by a Senate panel has found evidence that the mostly Afghan force of private security guards the U.S. military depends on to protect supply convoys and bases in Afghanistan is rife with criminals, drug users and insurgents.The Senate Armed Services Committee inquiry, based on interviews with dozens of military commanders and contractors and a review of over 125 Pentagon security contracts, found evidence of “untrained guards, insufficient and unserviceable weapons, unmanned posts” and other failings that put U.S. troops at risk.More alarming, the report alleges that some local warlords who have emerged as key labor brokers for private security firms are also Taliban agents.Sen. Carl Levin (D., Mich.), the chairman of the committee, said failures to adequately vet private security contractors in Afghanistan poses “grave risks” to U.S. and allied troops. The overall lack of proper contractor supervision, he added, poses a fundamental threat to the U.S. mission.

Afghan President Hamid Karzai has ordered that all security firms in Afghanistan be dissolved by the end of the year, though that process has only just begun. Coalition officials have supported the effort because of concerns about the private forces, but say the alternativethe Afghan policeisn’t yet competent enough to take over the job.The majority of the private security contractors are Afghan; companies employing them are both international and locally based. The Senate inquiry focuses on the role of Department of Defense contractors, but the State Department also employs private guards.According to U.S. Central Command figures cited in the report, Afghanistan has more than 26,000 private security personnel, 90% of whom are working under U.S. government contracts or subcontracts.

Doug Brooks, the president of International Peace Operations Associations, a group that represents security firms, said the report highlights the difficulty in complying with contract requirements to provide local hires. “There’s not a huge amount of choice in the local hires they can use,” he said. “Where are they going to get guys who have never smoked hashish, who have never worked for the Taliban or who have never considered joining the Taliban?”The investigation, quoting a Naval Criminal Investigative Service report, said “contractors have been known to shoot at Marines” and that Afghan security personnel were often “high on drugs” while at their posts.

In one case, Senate investigators found, a Marine was killed earlier this year by U.S.-funded security contractors who opened fire on a Marine foot patrol in Farah province.In another example, the son of a man who provided staff for a guard force at a coalition facility was “suspected of being an agent of a hostile foreign government,” likely shorthand for Iran.The inquiry singles out two security firmsArmorGroup, a subsidiary of U.K.-based G4S PLC, and EOD Technology Inc., or EODT, of Lenoir City, Tenn.for relying on dubious local power brokers, including individuals described in U.S. military reports as Taliban affiliates and criminals.

An ArmorGroup spokesman said the company “engaged workers from two local villages as stated by the Senate Reportbut did so only upon the recommendation and encouragement of U.S. Special Forces.”The company’s personnel “remained in close contact with U.S. Special Forces personnel to ensure that the company was constantly acting in harmony with, and in support of, U.S. military interests and desires,” the spokesman said.EODT said in a statement it “has never been advised by the U.S. military” of problems with its hiring practices. The company said it has cooperated with the investigation and “stands ready to engage the U.S. military or other stakeholders about these issues in order to improve our internal processes and contract performance.”A contractor interviewed by investigators described the local guard force recruiters as “straightforward 1920s Chicago.”
more infor :http://www.uggsboots-mall.com/

ugg boots
ugg slippers

Afghanistan The Great Game - A Personal View by Rory Stewart.1of2

In episode one Rory Stewart tells the story of British interventions in Afghanistan in the 19th century, when the British Empire became obsessed with the ide…
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Find More Afghanistan Articles

Since the beginning of the the Afghan War in 2001 up to the current day, there have been 2000 U.S. servicemen and women who have lost their lives. That numb…
Video Rating: 4 / 5

Twenty segments of the U.S. Marines’ brave, demanding efforts in Sangin, Afghanistan over a 20 month period that include establishing a patrol base, combatin…
Video Rating: 4 / 5

NEW DELHI — Bollywood finds mention in WikiLeaks in a confidential cable sent by U.S. diplomats in India suggesting that the appeal of Bollywood stars in Afghanistan could aid international efforts to stabilize the country.

Media reports here over the weekend have quoted the March 2007 cable that was a response to a request from Washington for “specific, concrete ideas for opportunities for India to use soft power in helping Afghanistan’s reconstruction.” The cable from U.S. diplomats in India said Bollywood was an area that “seems ripe” and added, “We understand Bollywood movies are wildly popular in Afghanistan, so willing Indian celebrities could be asked to travel to Afghanistan to help bring attention to social issues there.”

However, the U.S. embassy’s proposal to send Bollywood stars to Afghanistan never materialized.

Bollywood movies have been hugely popular in Afghanistan for decades and 1975′s hit action-romantic caper Dharmatma became the first Indian movie to be shot in the country directed by leading star Feroz Khan and featuring popular actress Hema Malini.

In recent years, despite security concerns, leading Bollywood banner Yash Raj Films shot its 2006 production Kabul Express in Afghanistan starring top actors John Abraham and Arshad Warsi.

Meanwhile, local media Monday also quoted WikiLeaks mentioning another U.S. embassy cable that referred to the threat faced in February this year by Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan from a local political party (the Shiv Sena) which wanted to ban screenings of the actor’s latest film My Name Is Khan.

The debut Bollywood release by the newly launched Fox Star Studios India, My Name Is Khan was set for a 12 February release but “the Shiv Sena had threatened to ban screenings… because Shah Rukh Khan publicly lamented the absence of Pakistani cricket players in India’s professional cricket league for the coming season,” said the cable dated Feb 22, 2010.

Khan also co-owns one of the India Premier League teams that could not bid for any Pakistani players.

Following initial protests which saw Shiv Sena workers burning the film’s posters in front of the actor’s Mumbai mansion, the film eventually released after “a show of force by the police convinced theaters to roll out a full release.”

The entire incident became a major media event, and as the U.S. cables mention, “With protests and controversy generating far more international buzz than the typical Bollywood movie, Khan’s new movie opened to packed audiences in Mumbai and elsewhere.”

Referring to the WikiLeaks cables on Bollywood, leading business paper The Economic Times featured an editorial Monday headlined “Winning ways: Bollywood in the Afghan Wars” which said, “With Bollywood’s reigning deity Shah Rukh Khan actually tracing his ancestry back to the same stark land (Afghanistan), it is entirely logical that the Americans would have wanted to rope in the big guns of the Bollywood brigade to capture key theatres in Afghanistan… A few star-studded, bump-and-grind Bollywood extravaganzas could well have been far more effective in luring out those lurking in the deepest recesses of the Tora Bora mountains than drone attacks.”

Article by Nyay Bhushan

For more celebrity news, go to Celebrity News Blog or Hot Hollywood News.

Find More Afghanistan Articles

Categories

Join Our Inner Circle